Commentary for Bava Batra 159:7

מיתיבי דבש בכוורת אינו לא אוכל ולא משקה אמר אביי לא צריכא אלא לאותן שתי חלות רבא אמר רבי אליעזר היא

[IF HE BUYS] HONEY-COMBS, HE MUST LEAVE TWO COMBS etc. R. Kahana said: Honey in a beehive never loses the designation of 'food'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As regards its subjection to the laws of Levitical defilement (v. Lev. XI, 34). The quantities equal to the contents of one and a half and one egg are Prescribed as minimums for 'food' and 'drink' respectively to transfer levitical impurity [v. Maim. Yad. Tum'ath Oklin, IV, 1-3]. ');">¹²</span> This proves that he is of the opinion that no intention<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., whether the owner intended the honey to be used as food or has not thought about it at all, it is always regarded as 'food'. ');">¹³</span> is required. An objection was raised: [It has been taught]: Honey in a beehive is neither [regarded<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra n. 2. ');">¹⁴</span> as] 'food' nor [as] 'drink'! — Abaye replied: This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Baraitha. ');">¹⁵</span> referred only to those two combs.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which are left in the beehive to nourish the bees during the winter. They therefore are not considered human 'food'. ');">¹⁶</span> Raba said: This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Baraitha. ');">¹⁵</span> is [in accordance with] R. Eliezer.

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 159:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.